Feitelson v. Google Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
[Re: ECF 38]
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge
In this putative class action antitrust case, plaintiffs Gary Feitelson and Daniel McKee (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) allege that defendant Google, Inc. (“Defendant”) restrains .trade in the market for Internet search through confidential agreements with cell phone manufacturers. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Def.’s Mot., ECF 38. The Court heard oral argument on the matter on December 18, 2014, after which it deemed the matter…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CollegeNET, Inc. v. Common Application, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- In re Qualcomm Antitrust Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Bakay v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- De Coster v. Amazon.com IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Reiss v. Audible Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025