Pruitt v. Farber

Appellee instituted proceedings in ejectment to recover the possession of certain described lands, situated in Clinton county, Indiana, of which he alleged that he was the owner in fee, etc. A trial resulted in the court awarding a judgment in favor of appellee. Appellant filed a motion for a new trial, assigning as the only reasons therefor that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evi*2dence, and that it is contrary to both the evidence and law. This motion the court overruled, to which appellant excepted, and sixty days were granted to file a bill of exceptions. The only…