Legal Opinion
Bohlin v. Camille
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided November 15, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTiffany, J.
This is an action in contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover an alleged balance due on a promissory note executed by the defendants. The sole question framed for review by the instant report is the propriety of the trial court’s denial of the plaintiffs Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 56 motion for summaiy judgment.
The report and docket entries indicate that this action was commenced on March 27, 1980. The complaint alleged that, for valuable consideration, the defendants executed a promissory note on April 8,1976 in the amount of $19,000.00; the defendants defaulted in their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Leonard v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Deutsch v. OrmsbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Loew v. MinasianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Quint v. MoffieMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987
- Pleasant Travel, Inc. v. ButlerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
- Price-Hanson v. PareMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
- Seigal v. Fitz Taxi, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986
- Munro v. U.S.-China Peoples Friendship Ass'nMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.