Legal Opinion

Loew v. Minasian

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 13, 1972PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.

This amended declaration in contract alleged that the three defendants made a demand note payable to the plaintiff in the amount of $17,500, with interest as provided in the note, on or about September 12, 1968, and have refused to pay the same on a demand made on or about October 1, 1969. A copy of the note was attached to the declaration. The defendants’ answers pleaded (1) general denial, (2) payment, (3) lack of consideration, (4) failure of consideration, and (5) denial of genuineness of signatures. The defendants then admitted, by their failure to respond to the plaintiff’s notice to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nylen v. GeeraertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Urbano v. Ouimet Stay & Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC v. DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Norfolk County Trust Co. v. VichinskyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  4. Weinstein v. SteigmanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Rugby Milling Co. v. LogoszNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API