Legal Opinion

Timms v. Delisle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1840PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This was an action of debt by Timms against the defendant as administrator of C. Delisle, the indorser of a promissory note payable at the branch of the state bank of Indiana, at Vincennes., The defendant pleaded the general issue and plena administravit.

The plaintiff proved by a notary public,, that the note, at maturity, was protested for non-payment and want of funds at the bank; that a notice to the defendant, in the usual form, was deposited by the witness in the post-office at Vincennes; that Delisle in his lifetime resided, about three miles from Vincennes, and witness understood that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. President of the Bank of the United States v. CarnealSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Bank of Geneva v. HowlettNew York Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Westfall v. FarwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Riggs v. HatchU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
  4. Sharpe v. DrewIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API