President of the Bank of the United States v. Carneal
Supreme Court of the United States
ERR.OR to the circuit court of Ohio. , ,This suit was originally brought against William Steele,. William Lytle, and Thomas D. Carneal. The .plaintiffs counted in assumpsit for money lent and advanced, under a provision of the statute of the state of Ohio, authorising a joint suit against all the parties to a promissory note. The original process Was served upon William Steele and IVilliam Lytle.
Read the full summary
ERR.OR to the circuit court of Ohio. , ,This suit was originally brought against William Steele,. William Lytle, and Thomas D. Carneal. The .plaintiffs counted in assumpsit for money lent and advanced, under a provision of the statute of the state of Ohio, authorising a joint suit against all the parties to a promissory note. The original process Was served upon William Steele and IVilliam Lytle. As to Thomas D. Carneal, the marshal of the district of Ohio returned “not found;” and this return being suggested of record, the plaintiffs, at the September term of the circuit court for the year…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Story
This is a writ of error to the circuit court of. the district of Ohio. The Bank of the United States brought a joint action against William Steele, William Lytle, and Thomas D. Carneal '(the defendant in error), upon a promissory note dated at Cincinnati on the 22d of-August. 182.0, whereby Steele promised to pay Carneal or order, at the office of discount and deposit of the Bank of the United States, at Cincinnati, the sum of .$11,¿63 in sixty days after date; .which, note was afterwards successively indorsed by. Carneal and Lytle, and was discounted by the bank, and dishonoured.át…
2Cited by54 opinions
- Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Saltmarsh v. TuthillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
- Nelson v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Commercial National Bank v. HenningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Shelburne Falls National Bank v. TownsleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.