Legal Opinion

Fisher v. State Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

— This was an action of assumpsit brought by the state bank against Horace B. Taylor and Sterns Fisher, as indorsers of a promissory note negotiable and payable at the branch at Fort Wayne of said bank.

The declaration alleges that the note was made on the 19th of July, 1842, by one Marshall S. Wines, since deceased ; that it was payable to Taylor 90 days after date; that, afterwards, bn the day it was made, it was indorsed by the payee to Fisher, and by the latter to the plaintiff. The dishonour and notice are averred.

Plea, non assumpsit. There is also a special plea, which we understand to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Piatt v. EadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1820
  2. Timms v. DelisleIndiana Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benson v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Turner v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. First National Bank v. German BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Sharpe v. DrewIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API