Gonzalez v. State of Oregon
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The question in this case is whether petitioner’s defense counsel provided constitutionally adequate assistance when he advised petitioner that the federal government may deport him if he pleaded guilty. The Court of Appeals held that counsel failed to provide adequate assistance because he did not tell petitioner that, -unless the Attorney General or his designee chose not to pursue deportation proceedings, petitioner would be deported. Gonzalez v. State of Oregon, 191 Or App 587, 593-94, 83 P3d 921 (2004). We reverse the Court of Appeals decision.
Petitioner is a citizen of Mexico. He…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Wang v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Verduzco v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. DinsmoreOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CarlosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ramirez v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Farmer v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.