Legal Opinion

Thayer v. Hedges

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

This suit was instituted upon a promissory note of the following tenor:

“$500. ■ March 26,1862.
“Eour months after date we promise to pay to Oel Thayer, or order, 500 dollars in gold, value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws.
“John W. Hedges, Martin C. Kleiger.”

The plaintiff prayed for a special judgment for the gold or its equivalent.

The defendant answered, alleging a tender of the amount due, before suit commenced, &e., in legal tender treasury notes, at their face.

A demurrer was overruled to this answer.

*284The plaintiff then replied, showing the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Chamberlain v. BlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
  3. Boyle v. Crawfordsville, Frankfort & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Reynolds v. Bank of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cory v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. De Biase v. Commercial Union InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
  3. Bickle v. BesekeIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API