Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Crawfordsville, Frankfort & Fort Wayne Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Clinton Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

Suit by the. railroad company against Boyle upon a subscription of stock.

The capacity of the plaintiff to sue is admitted. The execution of the subscription is admitted. The subscription is payable in cash, is shown to have been due before suit instituted, and the amount is specified in it.

McDonald $ Doaclie, and Suit, Cowan § Sims, for the appellants. Durden $ Davidson, for the appellee.

The defendant, in answer, sets up matter in avoidance.

He alleges that the articles gave him the privilege of discharging his cash subscription by work on the railroad; but he does not show that he ever…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank v. ParteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Thayer v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Bank v. ParteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API