Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Blue

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1843PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

The complainant filed his bill for the specific-performance of a contract, by which the defendants covenanted to indemnify-him from the payment of certain debts specified and referred to in the contract. The bill states that Chamberlain, the complainant, and Blackford Blue, one of the defendants, had been partners in trade by the name and style of Chamberlain and Blue; that at the time of the dissolution of the partnership, they were indebted to certain persons trad*528ing together by the name and style of Ames and Holliday the sum of $426.76, which the defendants covenanted should be paid by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Champion v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rutledge's Adm'r v. Townsend, Crane & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1863
  2. Miller v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Whitney v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. White v. FrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Mather v. SimontonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API