Legal Opinion
De Biase v. Commercial Union Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 8, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIrving Smith, J.
The attorneys for plaintiff and defendant have indicated that this is a case of first impression.
The facts having been agreed to by the parties: (1) that there was in effect a valid policy of insurance commonly referred to as a theft insurance policy, issued by the defendant, Commercial Union Insurance Company of New York, to the plaintiff, Ramon Be Biase, to insure his residence at 126 East 62nd Street, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, to the extent of $1,900; (2) that a theft of the plaintiff’s premises occurred on September 7, 1964, while the policy was in effect, which occasioned a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gregory v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Richard v. American Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Klauber v. BiggerstaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Salt Lake County v. Utah Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Republic Acceptance Corp. v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cotlar v. Gulf Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- McKee v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Crunk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Armstrong v. Taxation Division DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- National Surety Corporation v. SealeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.