Legal Opinion

Eppinger v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1900No. S.F. No. 1531PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

A demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained, and, plaintiff failing to further amend, defendant had judgment from which the plaintiff appeals. .

The said complaint contained two counts. In the first is set forth, in substance, that in a claim and delivery suit commenced by plaintiffs against defendant judgment had gone in defendant’s favor for the return to him of twenty-five thousand trays and three hundred sweat-boxes, or eighteen hundred and eighty-five dollars, the value thereof, in case a return could not be had, together with costs amounting to sixty-three dollars…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carpentier v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  3. Merriman v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McClellan v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Worden v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Hollman v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API