Eppinger v. Scott
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
A demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained, and, plaintiff failing to further amend, defendant had judgment from which the plaintiff appeals. .
The said complaint contained two counts. In the first is set forth, in substance, that in a claim and delivery suit commenced by plaintiffs against defendant judgment had gone in defendant’s favor for the return to him of twenty-five thousand trays and three hundred sweat-boxes, or eighteen hundred and eighty-five dollars, the value thereof, in case a return could not be had, together with costs amounting to sixty-three dollars…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carpentier v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Merriman v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- McClellan v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Worden v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hollman v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922