Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Oklahoma City General Hospital

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1937No. 27143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAYLESS, Y. C. J.

Arden Randolph, plaintiff in error, brought this action in the district court of Oklahoma county, against the Oklahoma City General Hospital, a corporation, defendant in error. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

The ease was tried to a jury, and when both sides rested, the defendant moved for an instructed verdict, which was granted, and the plaintiff appeals, alleging that the trial court erred in instructing the jury to return a verdict for the defendant; and the court erred in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff was in defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Denton v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Aderhold v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Aderhold v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Emerson v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wylie-Stewart MacHinery Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Hillcrest Medical Center v. WierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Wilson v. Lee Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Minogue v. Rutland Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  5. Hull v. Enid General Hospital FoundationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API