Emerson v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
This case presents error from the district court of Tulsa county, wherein plaintiff in error was defendant below and defendant in error was plaintiff below. For convenience the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff brought this action against the defendant for damages. A trial was 'had to the jury, with' a verdict for the plaintiff, and the court entered judgment for plaintiff on said verdict. Defendant filed a motion for new trial, which was overruled, and in due time brought this cause here for review. Defendant’s petition in error presents 22 assignments…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Aderhold v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by9 opinions
- McConnell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Yorston v. PennellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Orthopedic Clinic v. HansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Minogue v. Rutland Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Hull v. Enid General Hospital FoundationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.