Legal Opinion
Geistmann v. Schkade
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 26, 1938No. 8739PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, Justice.
Appellant, T. W. Geistmann, sued appel-lee, W. L. Schkade, for the conversion of ten bales of cotton, alleged to have been taken from a 160-acre farm owned by appellant without his knowledge or consent. Appellee filed a general denial, and by special answer alleged:
“That on or about January 31, 1936, he and plaintiff entered into a verbal agreement whereby defendant agreed to kill Johnson grass growing and that would' grow on the land described in plaintiff's pleadings for an agreed consideration of $25.00 per month for a period of seven months, and a part of the crop to be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stillman v. HirschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GiunTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Western Indemnity Co. v. MacKechnieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Automobile Ins. Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Texas Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dakan v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. HevolowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Peden Iron & Steel Co. v. ClaflinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Dunigan Tool & Supply Co. v. WhippleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Safety Casualty Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.