Legal Opinion

Heyman Distributing Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1941No. 25614. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

On certiorari, the superior court of Cook county reversed and set aside an award of the Industrial Commission in favor of plaintiffs in error, the parents and dependents of Seymour Gold, the deceased employee of the Heyman Distributing Company. We granted a writ of error to review its order.

The proof shows that for about two weeks prior to his death, Seymour Gold, a boy seventeen years old, was employed by the company as a stock room worker. The employer occupied the first and seventh floors of the building. Gold worked on the first and seventh floors and in the basement. It was part of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Consumers Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Imperial Brass Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. LaSalle County Carbon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Swigart Coal MineWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  2. B. F. Gump Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Northwestern Steel & Wire Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dravo Corp. v. StrosniderSuperior Court of Delaware · 1945
  5. Chadwick v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API