Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1932No. 20948. Judgment reversed and award set asidePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

Victor J. Sovinski filed an application with the Industrial Commission in which he charged that he suffered an accidental injury while employed by the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, and by which he sought the adjustment of compensation for the injury. Compensation was awarded by the arbitrator, the award was sustained by the commission and the latter’s decision was confirmed by the circuit court of Cook county. Upon the petition of the company, this writ of error was granted.

The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, the plaintiff in error, occupies several floors of a building at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Board of Education v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Newberry v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. M & K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Kensington Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Potter v. Realty Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Ceisel v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API