Legal Opinion

Toledo Agricultural Works v. Work

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Be Kalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

— This was a suit by the Toledo Agricultural Works, against Wesley I. Work, for the value of a “ Sulky Mower,” delivered to him upon his written order,and estimated to be worth $190.

Tbe sale was subject to a warranty as follows:

*254“"Warranted, that tlie machine herewith ordered shall be well built, of good material, and capable of cutting, if properly managed, an acre of grass or grain per hour, with a pair of good horses,” the purchaser to have the privilege of a trial of the machine.

The defendant answered in five paragraphs:

1. That he purchased the machine in DeKalb county, in this State ;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Walter A. Wood Mowing v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Fry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Schee v. McQuilkenIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Bradley v. Bank of the StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hockett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. New v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Ruhlman v. RuhlmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Pape v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Bader v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API