Legal Opinion

Hockett v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1886No. 12,703PublishedCited by 50 opinions

From the Marion Criminal Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Niblack, C. J. —

On the 13th day of April, 1885, the Legislature of this State passed an act entitled “An act to regu*252late the rental allowed for the use of telephones, and fixing a penalty for its violation,” the tenor of which is as follows:

“Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana, That no individual, company or corporation, now or hereafter owning, controlling or operating any telephone line in operation in this State shall be allowed to charge, collect or receive as rental for the use of such telephones, a sum exceeding three dollars per month where one…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  4. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. . BuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. City of Logansport v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Indianapolis v. NavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Eastman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. City of Rushville v. Rushville Natural Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API