Legal Opinion

Spitalny v. Tanner Const. Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1953No. 5637PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

This is an action by Tanner Construction Company, a corporation, plaintiff-appellee, versus Sam Spitalny and wife, defendants-appellants, for the recovery of the reasonable value of services rendered defendants by plaintiff in leveling certain land for them near Blythe, California, in 1948. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff and defendants appeal. The parties will be referred to hereafter as plaintiff and defendants respectively.

The facts are that defendants were the owners of certain desert land located near Blythe, California, lying within the Palo Verde Irrigation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. California-Arizona Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pleasant v. Arizona Storage & Distributing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. County of Greenlee v. WebsterArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Greenlee County v. CoteyArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cotey v. County of GreenleeArizona Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Tennessee Asphalt Co. v. Purcell Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Parker v. HolmesArizona Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API