Legal Opinion

Parker v. Holmes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1955No. 5876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

The judgment which is here reviewed was entered in a suit in the court below to foreclose a lien for labor and materials, under Section 62-201 et seq., A.C.A.1939, furnished by plaintiff-appellee T. C. Holmes to defendants-appellants Michael A. Parker et ux. in the construction of a drive-in theater. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant. The lower court found that defendant was indebted to plaintiff in the principal sum of $14,550 plus interest and costs, which sums were decreed to be a personal obligation of the defendant and also a lien on the real…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Timber Structures, Inc. v. C. W. S. Grinding & MacHine WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lanier v. LovettArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Surf Properties v. Markowitz Bros.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Wigfield v. AkridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Withrow v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. EFC Development Corp. v. F. F. Baugh Plumbing & Heating Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  2. Lenslite Co. v. ZocherArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Wooldridge Construction Co. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Farris v. McCrackenOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. United Metro Materials, Inc. v. Pena Blanca Properties, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API