Shanabarger v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-defendant Ronald L. Shana barger appeals his conviction for Murder, 1 a felony. Specifically, Shanabarger contends that the trial court erred: (1) in failing to grant his motion for judgment on the evidence because the State did not prove the corpus delicti of the crime; (2) in allowing his former trial counsel to testify at trial; (8) in permitting a clergyman to testify for the State; (4) in failing to grant a mistrial when it was shown that the State failed to disclose certain exculpatory evidence in a timely fashion; and (4) in conducting an interview of a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Mayberry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Malinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Shanabarger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gast v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ransom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.