Legal Opinion
Corll v. Edward D. Jones & Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1995No. 85A02-9408-CV-462PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Virgil C. Corll, et al., (the "Investors") bring this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's orders granting two motions to compel discovery. 1 Edward D. Jones & Compa ny ("Jones") moved to compel disclosure of the content of certain meetings the Investors had with attorneys prior to filing suit, and the Investors sought a protective order on the basis of attorney-client privilege. The trial court denied the Investors' request for a protective order. 2
We reverse.
ISSUE
The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court abused its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States of America and William C. McCormick Special Agent, Irs v. J. Martin LawlessCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Colman v. HeidenreichIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Edward D. Jones & Co. v. ColeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mayberry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Harter v. University of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
- Mutual Security Life Insurance Co. Ex Rel. Bennett v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Allianz Insurance Co. v. Guidant Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Penn Central Corp. v. BuchananIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.