Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon Gerald L. Shargel, Esq. John Doe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 13, 1984No. 1448, Docket 84-1156PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
John Doe, on behalf of himself and five other clients of Gerald L. Shargel, Esq., appeals from Judge Lasker’s order denying a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena duces tecum requiring Mr. Shargel to produce records of all fee arrangements or property transfers from, to, or on behalf of ten named individuals, six of whom invoke the attorney-client privilege.
We affirm.
BACKGROUND
On March 5, 1984, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of New York issued the subpoena in question re quiring, inter alia, that Mr. Shargel produce records of any monies or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Harriet Ramseur v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon John Doe, Esq. Richard Roe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Elizabeth Hanford DOLE, Secretary of Labor, Petitioner-Appellee, v. John MILONAS, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.