Legal Opinion

Leake v. Commissioner of Consumer Prot., No. Cv98-0061494s (Mar. 25, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 25, 1999No. CV98-0061494SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The plaintiff, Russell Leake, appeals from the decision of the defendant, the commissioner of consumer protection ("the Commissioner"), finding that the plaintiff engaged in violations of the Home Improvement Act, General Statutes § 20-426 et seq. The defendant acted pursuant to § 20-418 et seq. of the General Statutes and in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act; General Statutes § 4-166, et seq. The plaintiff appeals pursuant to §§ 20-431 and 4-183 of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API