Brogan v. Bright-Brooks Lumber Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtfeld, J.,
This is an appeal by defendant from the order of the court below, discharging a rule ex parte defendant to show cause why the writ of attachment in a foreign attachment proceeding should not be quashed.
The opinion of the court below correctly sets forth a summary of the proceedings and from which we quote: “On May 26, 1939, the plaintiff commenced this action of foreign attachment in assumpsit. An appearance was entered for the garnishee and on August 9, 1939, the garnishee’s attorney filed a rule on the plaintiff to show cause why the attachment should not be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Davis v. Investment Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Konopka Et Ux. v. McAteerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- First National Bank of Omaha v. CrosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Nazareth Cement Co. v. Union Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- North American Properties, Ltd. v. Pocono Farms Lot Owners Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- General Maintenance Engineers, Inc. v. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Chelmsford Worsted Co. v. Ria Herlinger Fabrics, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948
- Greenwald v. Murvin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1963
- Thalheimer v. Vineland Construction Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.