Rich v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Michael Rich was convicted of having transported in interstate commerce shoes which he knew to have been stolen, and of having those shoes in his possession with such knowledge, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error, hereafter defendant, was convicted and sentenced for having on July 28, 1917, transported in interstate commerce from East St. Louis, Ill., to St. Louis Mo., 80 pairs of shoes which had theretofore been stolen from the Big Four Railway platform in said East St. Louis, being a shipment made by French, Shriner & Urner, of Boston, Mass., to the J. G. Brandt Shoe Co., of St. Louis, Mo., said defendant at the time of said transportation well knowing said shoes to have been stolen, and for having said shoes in his possession with the knowledge aforesaid.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- Naftzger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Berryman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Morton Butler Timber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.