Legal Opinion
State v. Gainey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 8, 2003No. AC 22351PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendant, Arthur Gainey, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1) and risk of injury *157to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21.1 The defendant also pleaded nolo contendere to a charge, contained in a part B information, of being a persistent felony offender in violation of General Statutes § 53a-40 and was found guilty. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) conducted its in camera review of certain documents and redacted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WalshConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. PriceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. GombertConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. PepperConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. BriscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.