Legal Opinion
State v. Pepper
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 26, 2003No. AC 23376PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant, Justin C. Pepper, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court denied him his constitutional right of confrontation by precluding him from questioning the victim about her motive to accuse him falsely of sexual assault, (2) pursuant to Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S. Ct. 2240, 49 L. Ed. 2d 91 (1976), the state violated his constitutional rights by using his postarrest and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. JenkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. BereisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. SellsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.