Legal Opinion

Zinker v. Doty

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 29, 1990No. Nos. 1252, 1253, Dockets 89-9122, 89-9124PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:

J. Paul Doty and Judith A. Kemp appeal from an amended judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut which followed a jury trial before Judge Cabranes. The original judgment awarded Nancy Zinker $675,000 in compensatory damages against Doty and Kemp individually and $50,000 in punitive damages against each of them. The amended judgment, entered in response to the defendants’ motion for judgment n.o.v., eliminated the punitive damage awards. Zinker cross-appealed from the district court’s order eliminating the punitive damage…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Tedesco v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. Chayo v. KaladjianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  4. Jenkins v. Area Cooperative Education ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
  5. Zinker v. DotyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API