Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUghetta, J.

It will be convenient to refer to the appellants as the “ employer ” and to the respondent as the “ employee.” The action is by the employer for a judgment declaring it to be the owner of United States Patent No. 2,602,565 issued to the employee, to direct an assignment of said patent accordingly, and for “ other further and different relief ”.

Few of the facts are seriously disputed. The patent covers a reusable screw-top can. The device was developed by the employee in the course of his employment and at the employer’s expense. It was manufactured and sold by the employer with the employee’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Houghton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance v. Bakers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Yeshiva University v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API