Legal Opinion

MacPhail v. Pinkerton's National Detective Agency, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1939No. Appeals, Nos. 315 and 316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an action in trespass brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant corporation, employer of the person charged with an assault on the wife plaintiff. The jury rendered verdicts in favor of both plaintiffs. The court entered judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of defendant. This appeal followed.

Excepting as to the denial of the alleged assault, there *352is no serious dispute as to the facts. Shortly before noon on October 14, 1935, a man, later identified as D’Ambrosio, an employee of the defendant, Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency, Inc., called at the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. McClung v. DearborneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Philad. Traction Co. v. OrbannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Guille v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Herr v. Simplex Paper Box Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nagelson v. Fair Park National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Straiton v. RosinskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. McMASTER v. RealeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Gajkowski v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Maier v. PattersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API