Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1883No. 10,454PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Erom the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— The first error complained of by the appellant in this case is the overruling of its demurrer, for the want of sufficient facts, to appellee’s complaint. In his complaint the appellee alleged, in substance, that on October 20th, 1881, the track of appellant’s railroad crossed the public highway leading from Bloomington to Ellettsville, in Monroe county.; that at such crossing the appellant undertook to keep the same in good repair for the use of the public; that, on the day named, appellant permitted such crossing to get out of repair and become dangerous to cross; that the appellee, not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Bake v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Graeter v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. MacKay v. . New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API