Legal Opinion
William M. Hanlin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 6, 2003No. 02-5055PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL. Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge PLAGER.
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff William M. Hanlin, an attorney who represents veterans, appeals the November 1, 2001 decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims granting the government’s motion for summary judgment in this action for breach of contract and denying Hanlin’s cross-motion. Hanlin v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 697 (2001). The Court of Federal Claims held that, contrary to plaintiffs sole theory of recovery, no implied-in-fact contract arose between Hanlin and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Cincinnati v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- William M. Hanlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Andrew L. Cook, Individually and D/B/A Andy Cook's Truck Stop, and Jeanette Cook, Individually and D/B/A Andy Cook's Truck Stop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Kam-Almez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Jeremiah Harris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Night Vision Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Columbus Regional Hospital v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.