Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Curtis
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 26, 1967No. Civ. 30021PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.
Defendant condemnees appeal from a judgment awarding them $132,188.25 plus costs for property taken from them for highway purposes and for severance damages to their remaining property. The jury awarded $116,939.65 for the property taken and $15,248.60 for severance damages.
Appellants contend on appeal that the judgment should be reversed on two grounds: (1) that it was error to exclude, as an element to be considered in determining the fair market value of the remaining property for the purpose of computing severance damages, evidence that the property would become subject to forced…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. NeslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re HitchingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Cramer v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.