Legal Opinion

Spelling-Goldberg Prod. v. Bodek and Rhodes

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-2708PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

In this servicemark and trademark case, defendants Amer Trans Company, All Star Heat Transfer Corporation and Coleman Schneider have moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Pursuant to a request by the Court, the parties submitted briefs and factual evidence on the issues raised by the motion. After considering the motion and the materials presented, the Court concludes that the motion must be granted as it relates to defendant Coleman Schneider and denied as to the corporate defendants.

As Rule 4(d)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benn v. Linden Crane Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Columbia Metal Culvert Co. v. Kaiser Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Miller v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Feld v. Tele-View, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Brown v. CosbyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Strick Corp. v. A. J. F. Warehouse Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. One World Botanicals Ltd. v. Gulf Coast Nutritionals, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  3. Simkins Corp. v. Gourmet Resources International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Bucks County Playhouse v. BradshawDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Testa v. JanssenDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API