Miller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Russell P. Miller and Margaret Jane Miller, filed this action against American Telephone & Telegraph Company (“AT&T”) and the named members of the Board of Directors of AT&T (“the individual defendants”) involving a $1,500,000 debt alleged by plaintiffs to be due AT&T from the Democratic National Committee, principally for telephone and other communication services rendered at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Illinois, and during the 1968 Presidential campaign. Federal diversity jurisdiction was invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
This…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Troy Bank v. G. A. Whitehead & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Donner v. Tams-Witmark Music Library, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Young v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- DiCesare-Engler Productions, Inc. v. Mainman Ltd.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Superior Coal Co. v. Ruhrkohle A.G.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.