Legal Opinion

Frehner v. Morton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1967No. 10525PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

Plaintiffs sued to collect for services rendered in landscaping around a newly constructed house owned by defendants Skeen in Summit Park, east of Salt Lake City, Utah. From a jury verdict and judgment thereon in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.

The points urged are (1) that the court erred in ruling that the landscaping work comes within the laborers’ and materialmen’s lien statute; and (2) that the evidence shows that the defendants did not authorize the work done.

In the fall of 1964 the defendants Skeen obtained a loan from the defendant Prudential Federal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King Bros., Inc. v. Utah Dry Kiln CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Stanton Transportation Company v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Dwyer v. Salt Lake City Copper Manufacturing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Headlund v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Backus v. HootenUtah Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kesler Ex Rel. Kesler v. RogersUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  2. McCombs Construction, Inc. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. Bailey v. CallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. All Clean, Inc. v. Timberline PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API