Legal Opinion

All Clean, Inc. v. Timberline Properties

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 27, 2011No. 20100394-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Judge:

1 All Clean, Inc., doing business as The Flood Company, (All Clean) challenges the trial court's denial of its request for attorney fees under the mechanics' lien statute. See generally Utah Code Ann. §§ 38-1-1 to -~40 (2005, 2010, & Supp.2011). Timberline Properties, James B. Farrell, and Farrell J. De-Hart (collectively, Timberline) cross-appeal, asserting that Timberline is entitled to attorney fees under the mechanics' lien statute for successfully defending against All Clean's mechanies' lien claim. In the alternative, it requests attorney fees incurred on appeal only.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. First of Denver Mortgage Investors v. C. N. Zundel & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Calder Bros. Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. King Bros., Inc. v. Utah Dry Kiln CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 2 Ton Plumbing, L.L.C. v. ThorgaardUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Total Restoration, Inc. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Total Restoration Inc. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API