Legal Opinion

Headlund v. Daniels

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1917No. 3014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. T. D. Lewis, Judge. Action by J. A. Headlund against Max Daniels and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, J.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff, an architect, in the district court of Salt Lake County, to foreclose a lien for services rendered the defendant Max Daniels in drawing plans and specifications and superintending the remodeling of a building commonly known as the Rex Theater, situate in Salt Lake City. The defendants other than Daniels were made parties because of their having, or claiming to have, some interest in the premises as lienholders or otherwise, and as to them it will not be necessary to here make further reference.

The amended complaint, in substance, alleges that a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Grand Central Min. Co. v. Mammoth Min. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Miller v. MarksUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Utah Commercial & Savings Bank v. FoxUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Wasatch Oil Refining Co. v. Wade, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Thompson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Stevens Wallis v. Golden Porphyry Mines Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Frehner v. MortonUtah Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API