Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. McConnico

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 27, 1979No. 34,418; CM 435387PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLETCHER, Chief Judge:

A military judge found Specialist Four Donald McConnico guilty of being an accessory after the fact, in violation of Article 78, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 878. Such a finding was contrary to the appellant’s pleas. The principal crime from which this accessory offense sprang was an assault with a dangerous weapon committed by a soldier named Per-due, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 928. McConnico was sentenced at *304his general court-martial to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, and forfeiture of $150…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. BruceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. DillonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. GarrettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. BattenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. NystromU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API