Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Miller
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Bill to enjoin tbe prosecution of two suits at law. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The bills in these case are filed to enjoin the further prosecution of two actions at law brought by the defendants Miller and Haslett as plaintiffs against the complainant as defendant. In each case the plaintiff sued as assignee of defendant Bancroft.
The complainant is charged as the successor of the Chicago & Northeastern Railroad Company in each action. In the Miller case the action was for moneys expended for the Chicago & Northeastern Railroad Company in building fences, station-houses, freight-houses, water-tanks, semaphores, and for work, labor, and material provided and money paid by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Des Moines Gas Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bruun v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Smith v. FotoMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Bridgens v. Dollar Sav. Bank of Kansas CityU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1895
- Otsego Paper Stock Co. v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Aurora Daily News Co. v. FrazierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.