Goody v. Goody
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
Appellee, W. Keith Goody (Father), petitioned to reduce his child support obligations assessed in his divorce. The district court found that Father’s existing financial condition represented a change of circumstance and, premised on that change, reduced Father’s child support obligations. Appellant, Barbara Goody (Mother), timely appeals.
We reverse and remand.
From the five issues identified by Mother, we need state only two in resolution of this appeal:
1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it found that a change of circumstances had occurred warranting a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cranston v. CranstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Combs v. Sherry-CombsWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Salmeri v. SalmeriWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Pinther v. PintherWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Nuspl v. NusplWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Watt v. WattWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Smith v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Rogers v. RogersWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Maher v. MaherWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Kyle Benton Askin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.