Legal Opinion

Kyle Benton Askin v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 2016No. S-15-0162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Chief Justice.

[T1] Appellant, Kyle Benton Askin, claims the district court applied an improper legal standard in denying his request for credit for time served in presentence confinement, He contends the district court made its decision based upon an erroneous understanding that it lacked the discretionary authority to award credit. We agree with Appellant and, accordingly, we reverse and remand to the district court.

ISSUE

[12] Appellant presents the following issue: f

Did the district court apply the correct legal standard in determining whether to award Appellant credit for time spent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wayt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sweets v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hedge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joseph Michael Cruzen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Hutton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Christopher Mark Nesius v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Elmer R. Petersen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API