Legal Opinion

Watt v. Watt

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1999No. 96-322PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question in this case is whether the discretion of the trial court to order a change in custody upon a material change of circumstances is circumscribed by a constitutional right of relocation. The mother, Brenda Kay Watt (Mrs. Watt), was granted primary care, custody, and control of the parties’ three minor sons upon her divorce from the father, James Robert Watt (Mr. Watt). The divorce decree provided for an automatic change of custody from the mother to the father if the mother moved more than fifty miles from Upton. When Mrs. Watt was admitted to the graduate pharmacy…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Zobel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Baxendale v. RaichIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jeffrey R. Arnott v. Paula a/k/a Polly A. ArnottWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hanson v. BelvealWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In Re the Marriage of CieslukSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API