State v. White
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
I
The principal issue before us involves the denial of defendant’s motions to suppress. Because defendant did not except to any of the findings of fact recited above, they are binding on appeal. State v. Colbert, 65 N.C. App. 762, 310 S.E. 2d 145, rev'd on other grounds, 311 N.C. 283, 316 S.E. 2d 79 (1984). The findings of fact establish that defendant by his own consent waived any right to object to the stop and search. We base our conclusion on the opinion of the United States Supreme Court on strikingly similar facts in United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 64 L.Ed. 2d…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BetheaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Petty v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.