Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1986No. 8518SC1128PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

For reasons set forth below, we hold that the court properly denied the motion to suppress defendant’s incriminating statements, but erred in denying his motion to suppress the physical evidence agents obtained when they searched his luggage without a warrant. Accordingly, the order denying defendant’s motion to suppress is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the judgment entered upon defendant’s plea of guilty is vacated.

I

Terry Turbeville and Steven G. Porter, narcotics agents for the North Carolina Bureau of Investigation (S.B.I.), were the only witnesses to testify…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LognerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API