CLINTON K. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, P. J.
On June 5, 1990, by adoption of an initiative designated on the ballot as Proposition 115 and entitled the “Crime Victims Justice Reform Act,” the voters of California authorized reciprocal discovery in criminal cases. The voters did not intend to apply the reciprocal discovery provisions to juvenile delinquency proceedings. (Robert S. v. Superior Court (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 1417, 1422 [12 Cal.Rptr.2d 489] (Robert S.).) The juvenile court may, however, under its inherent power, grant such discovery as facilitates the administration of justice and promotes the orderly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Prudhomme v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- JOE Z. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hubbard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- J.E. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hubbard v. Superior Court of Ventura Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- R.A. v. Chris HennDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025