Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Superior Court of Ventura Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1997No. B107598PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Here we hold that the prosecutor is not entitled to discover notes prepared by a defense investigator that relate to an interview of a “prosecution” witness unless and until the defense announces an intent to call the defense investigator as a witness. Stated another way, the defense is not required to disclose statements it obtains from prosecution witnesses that may be used to refute the prosecution’s case during cross-examination.

Petitioner was charged with attempted murder and kidnapping. During the cross-examination of Tom Smith, one of the victims, defense counsel sought…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hubbard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API