Hubbard v. Superior Court of Ventura Cty.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Here we hold that the prosecutor is not entitled to discover notes prepared by a defense investigator that relate to an interview of a “prosecution” witness unless and until the defense announces an intent to call the defense investigator as a witness. Stated another way, the defense is not required to disclose statements it obtains from prosecution witnesses that may be used to refute the prosecution’s case during cross-examination.
Petitioner was charged with attempted murder and kidnapping. During the cross-examination of Tom Smith, one of the victims, defense counsel sought…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hubbard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997